But my distaste for those defaults is a reflection of the admin system provided by github, and git was designed before github.
Also, is there a single website that gives out words for other languages too, including Asian and European ones?
Apparently, you have been spending a lot of time on Github, and it is the real target of several of your criticisms.
This is about github rather than git, I suppose, but how is it possible for users to delete github accounts?
So I'd say, that your assertion that git isn't targeted at beginners leads to the conclusion that no free software project should use git.
But since in free software the turnover rate of developers is pretty high, all projects are dependent on getting new people to join.
Here are the best free and paid macOS text editors for plain text, coding, and everything in between.
Contemporary Russian Translation of the Bible (CRTB), The New Russian Translation (NRT), Russian Synodal Translation (RST)github.
Those commands would also be able to give much more verbose output, and be free from the dual requirements of human usability and scriptability.
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
That's a total user interface failure, because the actual meaning (up to date with the local branch) is the opposite of what the word origin implies.
To free password data from the clutches of other (bloated) password managers, various users have come up with different password store organizations that work best for them.
It was purposely worded uniquely, which means that all the returned search results are likely to relate to the Unlicense in some way.
Anyways, not everyone uses github, and things that seem necessary when using github can be silly in other contexts.
American Bible Society (free)With nearly 1500 Bible versions available across over 1000 languages, API.
Git and Github treat individual contributors to a single project as if they were each running their own project.
If you really wanted to preserve the original commits, you could probably work in one branch and then rebase onto another branch.
Atlassian makes a this great free git client that handles most of your common git tasks without any command line work.
Mercurial kept up, but lost repository hosters (first freehg early on, then google code which openly advertised Github as replacement).
If you cannot find what you want there, and what you want is a list of english words, then you should probably spend some extra time describing how to recognize what it is that you want.
Some of these are free, others are cheap, and some work with other tools to make Markdown more appealing.
In other words, more than half of the rant is a person used to wheelchair complaining about complexity of using wings.
In other words, new commits should normally go on top of pulled changes regardless of the timestamps without requiring a different set of commands or prior knowledge if what has changed in the remote repo.
Also, a lot of problems with git are really github issues, and most of those can be resolved by cloning a fresh repository and working with it.
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) also provides an example of a simple copyright disclaimer to be signed by an employer.
We always have to ensure that we regularly pull all history from all clones, so we don't lose development when a user decides to delete the github account.
Specifically, there are services that get information about the available Bibles, download the text of those Bibles, and search those Bibles.
Bible text for free; download the Bible data set to use in apps and software projects, how to access Bible as API, Bible download in XML, CSV, USFM, or other formats.
That we do most things over github is a big conceptual drawback, though: We always have to ensure that we regularly pull all history from all clones, so we don't lose development when a user decides to delete the github account.
Your specific feature suggestion, downloading unchanged files and leaving the changed ones alone, is not workable, as it would silently drop upstream code on the floor.
Github does the best it can to create usable workflows over the top of Git, but the underlying interface it works with is so ugly.
If you are struggling to make git with for you, download smartgit, sourcetree or gitkraken and give it all a second try.
In a nutshell, if github turns around tomorrow and demands money, or it cuts off access, then everyone who currently uses github will simply switch to another repo for upstream.
Or, if you can prefer, you can make all your changes in the same branch (and then pull that into master, this might be good if you are using github).
